Nova Istra

410 STUDIJE, OGLEDI, ZAPISCI Žarko PAIĆ cendence. Kierkegaard in his three spheres of the spiritual being placed into questi- on the credibility of the „system“ and „methods“ of what is the essence of western metaphysical history. It should be, of course, the notion of absolute science in the form of Hegel’s speculative-dialectical thinking the history. Today, when contem- porary techno-science had released heritage of metaphysics, then come to the core the idea of ​an radical transformation the notion of Being in the concept of infor- mation. The transition to a posthuman condition where is no more any difference between Being and beings, living and machine, human, animals and non-human, it is assumed insight into what determines the new sphere and techno-scientific operations as abolition the onto-theology in the emergence of life as an experiment. Kierkegaard’s three spheres of spiritual being – aesthetic, ethical and religious – have been merged into technosphere with a question on the boundaries between thinking and belief, on the event occurrence of what is no longer being nor being, neither living nor lifeless. How to approach it from the perspective of thinking that has been inverted the terms of essence and existence, starting with the creation of the entity’s freedom? Kierkegaard’s contribution to contemporary thinking as the power of technosphere may be broken down as a question on the subject of „philo- sophical faith“ in what upcoming beyond all spheres. Is it a place of divine God in pure transcendence of the subject or this place can still be justification the „philo- sophical faith“ in the event? Or should we finally must abandon any possible „faith“ that thinks not being more like the openness of the historical events, but as an event beyond the differences of philosophy and religion? The article will try to show that neither the Jaspers’ attempt to establish a new„philosophical faith“ in existence, and no renewal of the traditional opposition of mind and faith in the face of contingent events of technosphere are not able to create artificial mind and artificial life as a result of construction of the subject, not reaching to be events himself. Instead all of that, we must explain how technosfere should be caught in new thinking beyond metaphysics as aesthetic-ethical-religious critique of absolute science in the form of inhuman today. Keywords: subject, philosophical belief, technosfere, Kierkegaard, Jaspers, exis- tence, inhuman